VMA 2.20 :: What gives Vrindavan its effulgence?


kiṁ krīḍaiva śarīriṇī ? smara-kalā kiṁ dohinī ? kiṁ ratiḥ
svābhā mūrtimatī ? kim adbhuta-manojanmāstra-vidyaiva vā ?
kiṁ vā jīvana-śaktir eva satanuḥ śyāmasya ? na jñāyate
sā rādhā vijarīharīti hariṇā vṛndāvane'har-niśam||2.20||
Is this that appears before me
nothing other than play possessing a body?
Or is it the art of erotic love, yielding its gifts?
Or is it the pleasures of love,
taking an effulgent form?
Or is it only the science of Cupid's wondrous weaponry?
Or perhaps it is Shyamasundara's life energy embodied: 
I do not know. It must be Sri Radha,
who is dallying with Hari day and night
with eternally increasing intensity in Vrindavan.

This verse follows the formula of sandehālaṅkara, based on doubt. One speculates about the nature of the object being perceived by pointing to its qualities and those things to which they can be compared. In this case, it is the third kind of sandehālaṅkara called niścayānta, in which the doubt is resolved at the end of the verse.

Perhaps the most famous example of this rhetorical device is found in Kṛṣṇa-karṇāmṛta and quoted in Caitanya-caritāmṛta (2.2.75)–

māraḥ svayaṁ nu madhura-dyuti-maṇḍalaṁ nu
mādhuryam eva nu mano-nayanāmṛtaṁ nu |

veṇī-mṛjo nu mama jīvita-vallabho nu
bālo’yam abhyudayate mama locanāya ||

Is this Cupid himself?
Or is it the moon, a halo of sweet effulgence?
Is it the very embodiment of sweetness?
Or is it an immortal ambrosia for the eyes and mind?
Or is it the loosener of my braid,
Or perhaps the lover of my heart?
This boy arises auspiciously before my eyes! (KK 68)

The commentators are pressed to ask why the doubt arises and why it is rejected, as follows:

"Is this Cupid himself? If not, then how can he create such lusty feelings in my heart when he appears? No, no, it can't be Cupid, for though Cupid may be able to stir the mind, he does not have so much splendor, and this one here has literally waves of splendor! Then is it some kind of halo? But how could that be? There is light in a halo of course, but not so much sweetness! Then is this sweetness personified? No, for that does not have this nectar, that is relishable for the mind and the eyes! Then is it some fresh nectar for the eyes and mind? No, no, for there is an indescribable ocean of relish here that far transcends that! Is he, then, my Mādhava, the one who loosens my braid? Could it be my Prāṇa-vallabha Sri Krishna who has finally come to delight my eyes? It can only be he."

Such examples abound in the texts of the poets of Radha Krishna lila. As this example shows, there is a kind of hierarchy of guesses that progress until the only possibility left is the supreme object of love. It is a poetic figure that is used usually upon first seeing him or her, or upon seeing him or her after a long absence.
________________________________________

Here, Prabodhananda Saraswatipada follows on from the previous verse in which he gave a hierarchy of spiritual realities, concluding with Vrindavan, which lies within that realm that is the inner light of immeasurable transcendental bliss. And suddenly, there in Vrindavan, he sees the source of all this effulgence: it is Radha.

But before he can fully see Radha, first her qualities manifest before him, her tattva manifests, her effulgent beauty manifests.

kiṁ krīḍaiva śarīriṇī ? Is this verily play itself that has taken form? The potency that brings joy to Krishna, the hlādinī śakti is first and foremost his līlā śakti, but to say that his energy is play alone does not give us enough information about what that play is. And so Saraswatipada asks,

smara-kalā kiṁ dohinī ? Is it the wish-fulfilling heavenly surabhī of the erotic arts, bearing fruit for Krishna by manifesting a form? Yes, but this too is inadequate because it reduces her power over Krishna to external technique alone. And so he asks further,

kiṁ ratiḥ svābhā mūrtimatī ? Is she beautifully effulgent lovemaking taken form? Or kim adbhuta-manojanmāstra-vidyaiva vā ? the weapon that Cupid uses to magically bring the Supreme Male to his knees? These are all externals, is she not śyāmasya satanur jīvana-śaktir eva ? Shyamsundar's life energy itself ambulating before him?

Whoever she is or whatever she is, she constantly, eternally plays here, day and night, without cessation, in Vrindavan. This is why Radha is at the very heart of existence, because she is the very soul of the Supreme Deity, therefore she brings light and life to him, for what is light and life but love?

Therefore, Prabodhananda's hope lies in Vrindavan, because Vrindavan is the abode of such an effulgent gem as Radha. The author of Rādhā-rasa-sudhā-nidhi therefore says,

kiṁ vā nas taiḥ suśāstraiḥ kim atha tad-uditair
vartmabhiḥ sad-gṛhītair
yatrāsti prema-mūrter nahi mahima-sudhā
nāpi bhāvas tadīyaḥ |
kiṁ vā vaikuṇṭha-lakṣmyāpy ahaha paramayā
yatra me nāsti rādhā
kintv āśāpy astu vṛndāvana-bhuvi madhurā
koṭi-janmāntare’pi ||

What is the meaning to us of all these beautiful scriptures,
or of the paths of sādhana they prescribe
and which are followed by the saints
if in them there is no nectar-like glorification
of this form of prema, nor any feeling for her?
And of what use is even the supreme Lakshmi,
for Radha is not there in Vaikuntha, either.

May I therefore be blessed with the sweet hope
to be born in Vrindavan,
even if that should only come
after a million births. (RRSN 217)


VMA 2.19 : The innermost light
VMA 2.18 : It takes courage to live in Vrindavan
VMA 2.17 : Give up caste identity to dwell in Braj
VMA 2.16 : Where sin is concerned, be dumb, deaf, blind and inactive
VMA 2.15 : I will do violence to anyone who tries to remove me from Vrindavan
VMA 2.14 : Give up chewing the already chewed
VMA 2.13 : Ananta Vrindavan
VMA 2.12 : Vrindavan's trees, vines and deer fulfill the meaning of their names
VMA 2.11 : We bow to the trees and vines of Vrindavan
VMA 2.10 : Radha and Krishna pick flowers in their garden

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

O Mind! Meditate on Radha's Breasts

Image
Flickr As I go through the dāna-līlā episode of Chandi Das's Śrī Kṛṣṇa Kīrtana , there are many songs in which Krishna describes Radha's beauty, and a regular feature of that includes descriptions of her breasts. In fact, breasts are a subject that is prominent in all Sanskrit poetry, and is even standard in prayers to goddesses. There does not seem to have been any inhibition in talking about breasts in the ancient Indian culture, even though I dare say, there is more of one in the modern society, in spite of Bollywood. There is, however, an apparent restriction in talking about genitals, male or female, in the so-called erotic poetry of India--Sanskrit or vernacular--even when lovemaking etc., is described. Such descriptions would automatically fall into some other genre. In Radha and Krishna descriptions, I cannot recall ever seeing or hearing a passage that mentioned genitals or overt sexual activity. It is nearly always spoken of somewhat euphemistically. I remember
Read more

Swami Vishwananda's Bhakti Marga and Parampara

Image
It has been a little strange here at Jiva these past few days. Swami Vishwananda is here with his troupe of disciples, of whom there are a goodly number, perhaps 80 or so. When I arrived in Vrindavan already a couple of weeks back, almost the first thing I noticed at the corner of Mathura Road and the Parikrama Marg was a big billboard with Swami Vishwananda’s charming smile and glowing tilak staring charismatically out at the world and announcing that he would be giving darshan on March 8 at the Jiva Institute. Below him, in a smaller frame was Satyanarayana Dasa Babaji, who besides being his host will be speaking on the Bhāgavatam at the darshan event. This is not the first time that Vishwananda and his group have been at Jiva. Satyanarayana Dasaji calls Vishwananda a friend, and indeed the relations between the two are very cordial. Vishwananda's group is mostly young and enthusiastic, predominantly European (German and points east), who are very enthusiastic about
Read more

Erotic sculptures on Jagannath temple

Image
This was written on the basis of Sundarananda Vidyavinode's Sri Kshetra and intended for a devotee audience, as it was done on a commission by disciples of Bhakti Promode Puri Maharaj. It has never been published. I decided to put this on line since there was a discussion on Facebook on the subject and I thought I would revisit what I wrote here nearly twenty years ago. This is from chapter ten on temple renovations. Please note that I have removed the images that I had found of some of the sculptures. I have been blocked from posting links to this blog on Facebook for some infringement of its "community standards". The only thing I can think of on this blog that might have offended some prudish person in cyberspace is this. I do not have much hope for redemption as it has been over six months since my ban is "under review" and there has been no sign of action. Needless to say, I find this heavy-handed action on the part of Facebook dangerously authoritar
Read more