tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31351038.post8018914692340039221..comments2024-03-26T13:06:41.178-04:00Comments on Jagat: Dana-lila and the Apotheosis of LoveJagadananda Dashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05887720845815026518noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31351038.post-82428353883711915052010-03-28T06:49:50.068-04:002010-03-28T06:49:50.068-04:00Just wanted to comment as a footnote, that in a re...Just wanted to comment as a footnote, that in a recent <a href="http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/exclusive/2010/khushboo-wins-pre-marital-sex-case-240310.html" rel="nofollow">courtcase</a> in the Indian Supreme Court, the Tamil actress Khusboo, who had been pursued on 22 counts for have spoken in favor of premarital sex and cohabitation, had all charges dismissed.<br /><br />Apparently the <a href="http://www.dailylatestnews.com/2010/03/24/live-in-relationship-is-not-a-sin-supreme-court-07640" rel="nofollow">judge mentioned</a> Radha and Krishna in relationship to this question. "Even Lord Krishna and Radha lived together according to mythology," the judges pointed out, adding no law prohibited either premarital sex or live-in relationships. "Please tell us what is the offence and under which section? Living together is (part of) right to life (given in the Constitution)," the bench said. The other two judges on the bench were Deepak Verma and B.S. Chauhan.<br /><br />There are too many links to give everything, but here is an interesting <a href="http://deshgujarat.com/2010/03/25/supreme-courts-comment-on-radha-krishna-is-unfortunate/" rel="nofollow">response</a> to the citation of Radha and Krishna as an example of "cohabitation."Jagadananda Dashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05887720845815026518noreply@blogger.com